Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-19-Speech-1-053-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121119.17.1-053-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, for the gradual establishment of a real area of justice, it is vital that we adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation – and these will have cross-border implications.
However, certain differences between national rules governing jurisdiction and the recognition of judgments still present an obstacle. Members from Slovakia and from other countries have already mentioned examples of citizens affected by this, and it is precisely so that such cases do not arise that we need provisions to unify the rules of conflict of jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters and to ensure rapid and simple recognition and enforcement of judgments given in a Member State. Therefore, the Brussels I Regulation is also exceptionally important for citizens of the European Union and for European businesses. Although the measure is partially satisfactory in its current form, some of its provisions need to be amended. I unequivocally support, for example, the abolition of
as our aim is to facilitate the free circulation of judgments and to enhance access to justice for our citizens. Overall, we must improve the Regulation in order to guarantee predictability and a high level of legal certainty.
However, in every case, our priorities must be the protection of weaker countries, the right to fair legal proceedings and clear reference to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata | |
| lpv:videoURI |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples