Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-19-Speech-1-051-000"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121119.17.1-051-000"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, based on what Mr Zwiefka said, I ask myself the following question: Why, if the regulation has worked well so far, do we have to change it? I come up with two answers that I find very disturbing. These come from what Ms Reding said. The first one, regarding the choice of court, is in response to Ms Reding’s statement that 90 % of large companies use choice-of-court agreements. This is because a large company is the stronger party in a deal. It will want to choose a court that it considers would be more favourable towards it. That is why I do not think that small companies will benefit from changes to the regulation. On the contrary, it is the large companies that will gain. The second point concerns what Ms Reding said: that we would get closer to the system used in the United States, that is, the regulation would bring greater federalisation of Europe. As an MEP who is fighting for a Europe of nation-states, of nations, I completely agree with what Mr Paška said on this issue, and find this position of further integration and greater federalisation of Europe unacceptable."@en1
|
lpv:videoURI |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples