Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-25-Speech-4-345-500"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121025.26.4-345-500"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
Thanks to my colleague Ms Keller, the first rapporteur on the EU Policy Coherence for Development, we managed to extract a solid report on EU policy and its influence on development cooperation. The report before us is the first monitoring report. At least, that was the intention. It does not reveal the weaknesses regarding the implementation of policy coherence, nor does it provide a summary of what has been achieved by the EU in that field. It was indeed a global report with a clear vision of what policy coherence in development cooperation must be. And that is a good thing. Therefore I voted in favour of the report.
It deals with five priority policy areas (trade, agricultural and fisheries policy, climate change and energy, security and migration) and frequently gets straight to the point (for example: ‘Deplores the publication of two separate reports on trade in general and on trade and development by the Commission which was counterproductive from the viewpoint of PCD’). The Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance has, moreover, reinforced the report: developing countries have the right to determine their development policy themselves and to protect their own economy. We also contributed aspects about fair trade and mineral conflicts."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples