Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-23-Speech-2-616-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121023.48.2-616-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, almost everything has been said that needs to be said, so I will keep it brief. Why data retention? After all, food stocks have to be replaced sooner or later. That means consuming or using the food and buying a new lot. At the beginning, the debate about data retention focused on its use in anti-terrorism. In practice, however, these data are available, so apparently they have to be used, and they are accessed to investigate a very wide range of crimes, including minor or moderately serious offences. Moreover, in the process, there is a growing data hunger that is driving the storage of types of data that were not originally envisaged. The volume of data is growing. At the very least, then, we must reduce the amount of data stored, the types of use, and the duration of storage. We must protect data from abusive forms of access and use. We should be open to discussing alternatives to the current practice, and we must be mindful of one principle above all: that the rule of law and the protection of civil rights are key pillars of governance in our countries and the EU. They must be respected and defended, if necessary by abolishing the Directive."@en1
|
| lpv:videoURI |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples