Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-23-Speech-2-604-000"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20121023.48.2-604-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". Mr President, as regards the position of the Justice Minister, the German Federal Constitutional Court has not said that the Data Retention Directive is unlawful. The Federal Constitutional Court merely pointed out that the provisions of the transposing law did not ensure adequate security of data storage and that safeguard provisions in relation to the state’s access to data were too weak. These, and nothing else, were the points on which the Court based its judgment. That being the case, Germany must act on the commitments undertaken at the European level and transpose the Directive. As for Toulouse, it is always important to ensure that cases stand up in court, and for that, evidence is essential. If there is evidence of unlawful behaviour, then it is sensible to give due consideration to any evidence that may have been gathered though data retention as well."@en1
lpv:videoURI

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph