Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-23-Speech-2-509-937"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121023.45.2-509-937"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"In May 2012 Parliament postponed closure of the accounts of the European Environment Agency (EEA) for the financial year 2010 and refused to grant discharge. The main reasons for this decision were connected with conflicts of interest, particularly involving the Agency’s Executive Director. In this second report, the rapporteur maintains her position and is highly critical of the progress made by the Agency. Three aspects stand out in this assessment: painting of the façade of the Agency’s building without issuing a public tender, which, in order to cover the costs, required a reinforcement of budget line 2140 – ‘Fitting-out of premises’; contradictory information sent by the Executive Director on her relationship with Earthwatch, and use by a non-governmental organisation of the EEA’s premises, without any rent payment. We supported the rapporteur’s position, unlike the majority in Parliament, which therefore opted to grant discharge for the EEA budget (financial year 2010)."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples