Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-23-Speech-2-289-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the EC and Israel on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (CAA) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121023.17.2-289-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-23-Speech-2-290-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Franziska Katharina Brantner2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; SEDE (2012-01-19--2013-07-03)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2009-07-14--2013-10-21)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2013-10-21)3 substitute; BUDG (2012-01-19--2013-10-21)3 substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2013-10-21)3 member; AFET (2012-01-19--2013-10-21)3 substitute; FEMM (2012-01-19--2013-10-10)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, it is interesting that we are having this vote right after the Israeli Foreign Minister insulted our High Representative Baroness Ashton and the EU on Saturday, saying that the EU should focus on its own problems before making suggestions on how to resolve the crisis and the terrible situation with Palestine. This is clearly mocking the fact that the EU has taken a stance on this issue, and its involvement in the problem. Commissioner, I think you have been trying to work on the question of the settlement products, but this is not the only thing that will help us out. The question we are dealing with in this Agreement on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (ACAA) is a territorial question: who decides the boundaries of Israel and our trade relations – Israel according to its own law, or the EU according to international law? In the Foreign Affairs Committee, we had asked for an interim report to clarify the legal questions. It is true, Mr Caspary, that the INTA chair at first decided not to go for that approach. We were quite sad to hear that, but it is interesting that we are now returning to that option. I consider that option is still the best one we can take – to clarify the legal questions and get an interim report that clarifies the outstanding issues. It is our task as parliamentarians to check the legal validity. This is not only a legal question but a political one also."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Franziska Katharina Brantner (Verts/ALE )."1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph