Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-13-Speech-4-215-250"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120913.29.4-215-250"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"This is a decent report throughout, from its basic structure onwards. Moreover, the Treaty of Lisbon set out a system of close integration between national and local parliaments according to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, which now – if such a thing is possible – take on even greater significance given the tension that Europe’s governance structure is subject to in view of the crisis. Bearing this in mind, I especially agree with the proposals and observations set out in paragraphs 7, 9, 11 and 13. Regarding minimising regulatory burdens, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), I think that the principle is as widely held as it has turned out to be difficult to apply in reality. It is now hard not to see over-regulation as the main thing holding back the development of dynamic economies. The Commission’s ‘tailor-made’ doctrine could probably be of help here, as – even more so – could the general approach based on the concrete proposals set out in paragraphs 22 to 28. In any case, the key to achieving the goals of the interinstitutional agreement is a shared experimental approach and a shared rigorous review and revision process."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples