Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-12-Speech-3-394-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-09-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Proposals for a European banking union (EBU) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120912.22.3-394-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-09-12-Speech-3-395-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Werner Langen2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2009-09-30--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2012-02-03--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ITRE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; ECON (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 chair; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-30--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"This has nothing to do with size, but is simply based on definitions. The rules also defined by the Basel Committee state that: a large supervised financial investment company is considered large if it has a balance sheet valued at over EUR 70 billion. This is a workable yardstick. Following the principle of subsidiarity, why should smaller banks not also be supervised by the national authorities according to the same rules? Why not? With regard to the guarantees: the taxpayers are in favour. If we are now also to include deposits, while the banks are laughing up their sleeves, then this is socially unjust and irresponsible in my view."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph