Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-12-Speech-3-289-004"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120912.18.3-289-004"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"This report included and still includes positive aspects, which we value. Some of these result from proposals made by our group in the Committee on Fisheries, such as: rejecting the privatisation of fisheries resources; greater consideration of the objectives of a fisheries policy, including social and economic aspects; and increased EU cofinancing for data collection on the status of stocks. Unfortunately, other proposals were weakened or even withdrawn in this vote in plenary. One such example is support for the renovation and modernisation of fishing fleets. The report rejects mandatory transferable fishing concessions, as proposed by the Commission. The report falls far short of what is needed in its review of our centralised common fisheries policy, which has prevailed in the last two decades, and in promoting proximity management, which goes beyond the (inconsequential) ‘regionalisation’ proposals tabled by the Commission and the greater involvement of regional advisory councils. Unfortunately, our proposals in this area were not accepted, inter alia expanding the area reserved for the exclusive access of Member States’ fleets. These shortcomings and contradictions justify our abstention."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples