Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-04-Speech-3-335-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120704.25.3-335-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-04-Speech-3-335-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Thomas Ulmer2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; TRAN (2012-06-14--2014-06-30)3 member; ENVI (2012-06-14--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-17--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". I abstained in the vote, as I would have liked to have heard and discussed further the response from the Court of Justice of the European Union. The whole way of working on the part of all sides needs to be discussed – polemics and false information have demolished the subject and, regrettably, not solved the problem. In our continued discussions of this matter, counterfeiting and intellectual property ought to be dealt with in two separate procedures. However, the question then arises as to whether individual global agreements are possible to achieve. Within the EU, we have to continue to discuss copyright, the Internet, fees such as those imposed by GEMA and free access and to find a viable approach to the problem. It reminds me very much of the rejected software patents, which at the time I voted against."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph