Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-03-Speech-2-692-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Common rules for direct support schemes for farmers - Support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development - Common organisation of agricultural markets and specific provisions for certain agricultural products - Financing of the common agricultural policy - Organic production and labelling of organic products - System of financing by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120703.26.2-692-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-03-Speech-2-693-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Czesław Adam Siekierski2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; REGI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CONT (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; AGRI (2012-01-23--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The Treaty of Lisbon increases the competences of the European Parliament and this requires specific adjustments. it involves identifying, in the current regulations, the implementing and delegating powers granted to the Commission under Article 290 and Article 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The adjustment to the Treaty of Lisbon is certainly not a technical procedure. In actual fact, it is a struggle for power between the three institutions. The discussion about the application of Article 43(3) of the Treaty or the division of acts into implementing acts and delegating acts are examples of this struggle. I believe that all important issues concerning the common agricultural policy should be contained in the basic act, in order for the legislators, namely Parliament and the Council, to have a direct influence on the shaping of the provisions. In fact, in order to view the full picture of CAP reform, it is necessary to be acquainted with the nature of the delegated acts and implementing acts to be presented by the Commission. The devil is quite often in the detail. I therefore appeal to the European Commission to present the outline of these acts as soon as possible. Finally, I would like to say that Members should be better informed and should be included in the negotiation process with the Council and the Commission. Currently, it is rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs who make all decisions during a trialogue. We need greater transparency. The trialogue should be open to interested Members serving on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, though they would not, of course, have voting rights."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph