Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-03-Speech-2-391-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120703.18.2-391-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-03-Speech-2-392-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jiří Maštálka2
lpv:spokenAs	quaestor; European Parliament (2012-01-18--2014-06-30)3 treasurer; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Parliament's Bureau (2012-01-18--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; JURI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ENVI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Quaestors (2012-01-18--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I would like to welcome the fact that this report has directed the European Parliament’s attention in relation to the Eastern partnership programme towards the practical side of our mutual relations in the area of the economy and trade. Even though the original version opened up and exacerbated the difference in ideological approaches less, the final version of the report is a good step towards improving our relations. Unfortunately, it completely failed to avoid formulations that amount to double standards when it comes to assessing Eastern partnership countries. It is important that the WTO accession talks are emphasised. In my opinion, however, it is more important to be able to make use of the benefits arising from cooperation with Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan, which have created a functional customs union. Turning our backs on this partnership would mean significant losses for the EU in the future."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph