Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-03-Speech-2-116-000"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120703.5.2-116-000"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"The Heads of Government have taken steps to combat the euro crisis: European banking supervision, support to European banks and the buying up of government bonds from the emergency fund. This is nothing short of a major step towards a European banking union. It is unfortunate that the situation in the euro area is such that many economists consider this substantial step necessary. I have three questions for the Council with regard to the outcome of the summit. Firstly, does direct European support to banks not weaken to too great an extent the incentive to the weak euro countries to put their affairs in order, both in the banking sector and in public finances? Secondly, the ESM Treaty. The German Chancellor and the Commission argue that direct support may be provided under Article 19 of the ESM Treaty without renewed ratification by national parliaments of any amendments to ESM. Does the Council take the view that direct support to banks does not require renewed ratification? Finally, to what extent is it realistic to assume that Europe will have an effective system of banking supervision as early as six months from now? That is a prerequisite for responsible spending of money from the emergency fund."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples