Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-02-Speech-1-080-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-02"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Recording equipment in road transport (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120702.18.1-080-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-02-Speech-1-081-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Gesine Meissner2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; FEMM (2012-01-19--2012-09-06)3 member; ALDE (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2012-12-16)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2012-12-16)3 unknown; Freie Demokratische Partei (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; DEVE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr Grosch, we agree on a great many issues. You just said that we need common applicability. I absolutely do not agree with that. You also said, however, that it should apply to professional drivers and not to the other groups. It seems to me that that is already not the case at present. Let us take the example of a master roofer, as a non-professional driver, who drives his materials himself and has a 2.8-tonne vehicle. That is a light goods vehicle, and many people have those, and let us then imagine that he drives over 100 kilometres once every three years, namely 103 kilometres one way, and so actually has to fit a digital tachograph. Does that sound proportionate to you? Do you, moreover, believe that safety would be jeopardised if that were not the case?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph