Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-24-Speech-4-213-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-05-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120524.19.4-213-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-05-24-Speech-4-214-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Frank Vanhecke2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2011-11-09--2014-06-30)3 member; DEVE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair_member_of_the_bureau; EFD (2011-11-09--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CONT (2012-01-19--2013-02-26)3 member; DROI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Onafhankelijk (2011-12-06--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"− It is odd that this resolution does not contain a single word regarding the problem of violence against homosexuals that is seen today in many European countries. This violence is usually the work of young Muslims and it is apparently not politically correct to flag this up and condemn it? That in itself is one reason to abstain from voting on this resolution, but there are others, too. Again, we are going too far here in disregarding the subsidiarity principle. In my opinion, it is best if the people and Member States decide whether or not they want to introduce marriage between people of the same sex and whether or not they want to recognise such marriages contracted in other Member States. After all, this is not a question of discrimination or the lack thereof. So, stop for God’s sake. Stop this European interference and confusion over terminology."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph