Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-22-Speech-2-303-250"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-05-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120522.15.2-303-250"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-05-22-Speech-2-303-3752
lpv:speaker	lp:Antonio Cancian2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Il Popolo della Libertà (2009-07-14--2013-12-15)3,3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; ITRE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3 member; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	"I voted in favour of the report on the internal market scoreboard because I agree that a coordinated and cooperative approach should be promoted in order to improve functioning of the internal market through timely and complete transposition of EU legislation. Complete transposition would allow the single market to be strengthened and to function more efficiently. Given that the definition of the category of SMEs (micro, small and medium) must be economically objective, definite and easy for Member States’ administrations to apply, I am in favour of creating a body led by a representative of the internal market who can operate without political pressure, tackling and resolving any possible violations, as suggested by Mr Busuttil. I also agree with the reference to SOLVIT, which is an extremely useful tool as it allows Member States to work together in resolving issues regarding misapplication of internal market rules: that is why I believe it is necessary to ensure a good level of financing from Member States, to ensure it functions as best it can. Finally, I hope that the new tools can increase transparency and allow us to understand the reasons for the partial or lack of transposition by those Member States that do not promptly transpose EU legislation in the area."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph