Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-22-Speech-2-232-250"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120522.15.2-232-250"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I voted against the report, even though it endeavours to maintain a certain balance in its call for respect for fundamental human rights and the principle of proportionality. However, the report is based on the Stockholm Programme and the strategic presence, via the CFSP, of EU forces in neighbouring countries and the rest of the world and, as such, is largely a move in the wrong direction. The report proposes increasing spending on security, interlinking the external and internal dimensions of security and forging a stronger link between EU external policy and organisations such as NATO. Finally, the report refers vaguely to extremist organisations, to the ‘importance of actions directed at countering violent radicalisation in vulnerable populations’ and ‘looks forward to the future work of the EU Radicalisation Awareness Network, with its mission of facilitating knowledge-sharing’. If and inasmuch as the report is alluding with this phraseology to poor sections of society, then its objective is to criminalise their expression and reaction. We also note that political forces on the left are systematically being labelled extremist. However, these issues are addressed by social policies, through education and through a fair distribution of wealth and social equality, not through policing, repression and informants."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples