Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-22-Speech-2-130-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120522.5.2-130-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The monitoring of the judiciary development in various EU partner countries should relate to the legislative and institutional process, not specific judicial cases. By involving itself in the assessment of Ms Tymoshenko’s case, the Parliament illegally acts as a court of appeal driven by a political rationale. Many of those who insist on sanctioning Ukraine have a hidden agenda unrelated to the human rights. They desire to stop the EU’s future enlargement by stopping Ukraine’s further EU integration. Likewise, these people want to freeze the grey international status quo of Ukraine by dividing its political operators into pro-Russians, left under Russian control, and pro-Europeans misled by empty promises. Special trade arrangements guaranteed by supporting certain political players in Ukraine could also be the motivation behind this approach. These do not reflect the European interest but some Member States’ interests or, at worst, those of some private groups. The European Parliament should reject such hidden agendas, while acknowledging that the EU is not strong enough to impose its wishes on Ukraine and that this country has other geopolitical alternatives than EU integration."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples