Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-10-Speech-4-389-500"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20120510.69.4-389-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"In favour. The key points in the Commission proposal are: a) to widen the conditions under which exports can proceed in the absence of a reply from the importing country (chemical has been used in the importing country in the last five years and no regulatory action has been taken); b) to give the Commission exclusive competence for external representation in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty; c) to involve the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in certain administrative tasks. Point a) was suggested in response to complaints from EU traders concerned that they could not proceed with exports due to lack of prior informed consent (PIC), even when this lack of PIC was allegedly due to the administrative incapacity/unwillingness of the importing country to react, even though the substances were often not banned/restricted in the importing country. As Greens/EFA, we tried to get rid of the wider conditions and to introduce further safeguards in case exports proceed without PIC."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph