Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-10-Speech-4-387-437"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-05-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120510.69.4-387-437"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-05-10-Speech-4-387-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Marisa Matias2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ITRE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ENVI (2012-01-19--2012-05-21)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2012-01-23--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Bloco de Esquerda (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2009-09-17--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I voted for this report because I believe that the provisions thereof will better protect public health, the environment and even the economy than those of the Commission proposal. I believe we should not facilitate the export of banned or severely restricted chemicals from the European Union to third countries. I was therefore unable to vote for widening the possibility of waivers in this regard. Failure to respond to an export request could be due to a number of factors, such as a weak administration, economic frailty or the belief that the case is covered by the general law. Lack of response cannot, therefore, be taken as acceptance of imports of these chemicals. The EU’s role should not be that of facilitating the export of banned chemicals from European territory to third countries with weaker chemicals legislation or administrations. The EU should be committed to safeguarding public health and the environment, rather than the profits of European manufacturers of chemicals banned in the EU."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph