Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-04-19-Speech-4-312-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120419.15.4-312-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The fights against terrorism and transnational crime are a major concern and should remain priorities in our action.
The Passenger Name Record (PNR) Agreement with the United States is a very flawed response to citizens’ fundamental rights. No account has been taken of the main objections relating to the scope of the agreement, which is very ill-defined, the data retention period, which is very long and does not include their deletion, the rights of administrative or judicial redress in the case of error and the mode of data transfer.
While recognising the efforts made by the Commission to achieve a more balanced agreement, it should be noted that essential principles such as the respect of individual rights and of European Union legislation and the protection of the personal data of EU citizens have not been respected.
The concessions made to US partners are likely to set a dangerous precedent in the negotiation of PNR agreements with future partners. For how can we refuse other countries the advantages that we have granted the United States? The agreement is not sufficiently balanced and does not guarantee that use is limited to the fight against terrorism. These data could in fact be used for other purposes."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples