Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-04-18-Speech-3-337-750"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-04-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120418.18.3-337-750"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-04-18-Speech-3-338-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Tokia Saïfi2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFET (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; INTA (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Union pour un Mouvement Populaire - Parti Radical (2009-07-14--2012-09-11)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The association agreement that I supported in plenary aims to strengthen ties between the EU and Armenia. Armenia’s European aspirations are an excellent lever for promoting democratisation and should be exploited to speed up the pace of reforms. For, in accordance with the ‘more for more’ principle, European integration of Armenia will continue apace if this condition is met. Sectoral cooperation between the EU and Armenia is intended to strengthen political dialogue, but also socio-economic integration and legal convergence. EU-Armenia is also a regional matter. The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has a major negative impact on development and stability in the South Caucasus. Above all, the tensions that it generates isolate Armenia and motivate it to adopt a policy on Iran that is out of sync with EU policy. I would say that the alternative, European integration, has got to be the best answer."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph