Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-03-15-Speech-4-263-875"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-03-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"lt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120315.19.4-263-875"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-03-15-Speech-4-264-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Radvilė Morkūnaitė-mikulėnienė2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; REGI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ENVI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Tėvynės sąjunga - Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". − I voted in favour of this motion for a resolution. The outcome of the elections did not surprise anyone, nor, unfortunately, have the events that have followed. I would like to ask rhetorically whether the European Union is satisfied with its strategic partnership with Russia and whether the EU believes that current formats, such as the dialogue on human rights, are producing any tangible results? The EU and Russia are mutually dependent but the EU’s strategic partner is not afraid of exploiting the disadvantages EU Member States face in energy for instance. Sometimes there is the impression that, as far as Russia is concerned, the EU is either wearing rose-tinted spectacles or is being purely pragmatic, which is dangerous for the EU. Friendship is highly desirable, but only if it is genuine. In the second Putin era, which has only just begun, heavy-handed rule and politics without compromise will only intensify, and the European Parliament will frequently have to return to the issue of human rights and democracy in Russia."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph