Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-02-16-Speech-4-464-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120216.23.4-464-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) programme is a joint project, whose applications and potential are undeniably in the public interest. However, it also includes elements about which we have reservations. A number of writers and researchers have reported that, on the pretext of ‘civil protection and security, [...] mobility and crisis management’, as well as of responding to humanitarian crises, the GMES has been serving possible military ends.
Once again, we repeat that this is why we are abstaining. Furthermore, political and strategic objectives in the area of security are clearly stated, particularly with regard to border checks, to maritime surveillance and support for EU external action; this is also mentioned in the related regulation, which we are also unable to support. The deeper into the areas of security and militarism the EU goes, the more current our concerns are. The policy on immigrants is an example of this, along with increased maritime and border surveillance, and taking advantage of disasters for the purposes of foreign intervention."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples