Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-01-18-Speech-3-148-500"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-01-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120118.19.3-148-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-01-18-Speech-3-149-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ildikó Gáll-pelcz2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2010-11-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2010-06-30--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Keresztény Demokrata Néppárt (2010-06-02--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2010-07-05--2013-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"− Though with varying degrees of intensity and using different arguments, everyone who spoke during the brief debate prior to the vote criticised the fiscal pact. This resolution’s main grievance lies with the European Parliament being ignored, and it also stresses Parliament’s concerns that the fiscal pact could serve as a basis for the creation of a ‘two-speed’ Europe, therefore seeing a necessity for all agreements over the next five years to be incorporated into EU law. According to the resolution, we need not only austerity measures, but also the promotion of economic growth, the levying of taxes on financial transactions, and bonds to alleviate the present shortage of funds. Personally I am missing from this draft, which has been recast several times now and still does not represent a final version, guarantees that would ensure that in the implementation of its measures the European Union will follow the EU method of decision-making which ensures democratic transparency and accountability. For these reasons I consider all points of this motion for a resolution important, and gave them my full support."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph