Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-14-Speech-3-277-500"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-12-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111214.22.3-277-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-12-14-Speech-3-278-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Paulo Rangel2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; EPP (2009-11-25--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-30--2014-06-30)3 member; AFCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Partido Social Democrata (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; JURI (2010-10-20--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Despite the large number of States that make up the European Union, the common defence system still has various weaknesses. There is a variety of reasons for this: to the most basic reference to the budgetary weaknesses experienced by various States can be added the lack of integration between the defence policies of the different Member States. In truth, coordinating policy between the various Member States would allow resources to be used more optimally and allow a true European defence force to be created, based on the complementarity of the armed forces of the different States. The rapporteur highlights six priority areas: better coordination of defence planning, pooling and sharing of capabilities, support for research and technological development, construction of a European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, creation of a European market in defence equipment and, finally, seeking new forms of funding. I voted in favour as I believe defence policy is one of the greatest challenges faced by the European Union; without it, our very political sovereignty would appear to be (effectively) threatened."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph