Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-12-13-Speech-2-310-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20111213.26.2-310-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"For a long time, criminal proceedings, at least in countries that had an Inquisition, have focused on the relationship between the authorities and the criminal, with the prevailing view that the legal problem that is raised mainly – or solely – concerns the violation of assets that are vital to the community. In other words, this was seen as a matter of public law. Moreover, the reference to the application of the penalty as the counterfactual stabilisation of the expectations of the community in respect of the validity of the rule that has been violated is well known. However, despite being able to provide an array of criminal policy guidance, this approach neglects the role of the victim. Damage to public assets is often accompanied by crimes against personal goods and the violation of private interests. The legislative process aimed at adopting a European Protection Order for victims of crimes comes within this context and seeks to provide the systems of the different Member States with instruments that allow them to protect victims from having further crimes perpetrated against them, as well as meeting the public aims of prosecution. Having reviewed this approach, I voted for Parliament’s position, with the minor amendments that have been made."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples