Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-17-Speech-4-254-500"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-11-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111117.17.4-254-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-11-17-Speech-4-254-6252
lpv:speaker	lp:Andreas Mölzer2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"In theory, it may be that we now have greater nuclear safety, thanks to research. However, nuclear power stations that are safe on paper may not, in fact, be safe in reality. In this context, it is also necessary to investigate whether there is good reason to suspect that nuclear power station operators are outsourcing technical maintenance and safety checks, placing massive pressure on the relevant personnel to cover up deficiencies. In general, I am opposed to this extremely risky technology. Instead of promoting this technology to the tune of several billion euro, effectively keeping it on life support despite all the safety risks and profitability concerns, we should spend this money on developing alternative, forward-looking energy forms. For this reason, I have voted against the report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph