Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-16-Speech-3-536-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-11-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for nuclear research and training activities (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111116.28.3-536-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-11-16-Speech-3-537-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Oldřich Vlasák2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2009-09-09--2012-01-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Občanská demokratická strana (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; PECH (2009-07-14--2012-01-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, first of all, please allow me to add my appreciation to the report of my colleague, Mr Březina. The extension of the Seventh Framework Programme for nuclear energy is a logical step. It concerns the ensuring of compatibility with the existing financial perspective valid until 2013. We all here know that the compromise proposal, which I personally support and which contains many improvements in the field of nuclear safety, was drawn up in the Council with great difficulty and at great length. I appreciate the many improvements regarding the simplification of the programme, including the reduction in the administrative burden. Austria and Luxembourg, which had long blocked the agreement, had some fundamental observations concerning in particular security aspects, and negotiations had reached stalemate. These Member States even considered the compromise proposal put forward by the Hungarian Presidency to be not responsive enough to their requirements. Now it is important, however, that the legislative proposal be passed as quickly as possible, but not later than the end of 2011, in order that the programme may continue in 2012. The European Parliament should therefore not complicate matters by pussyfooting around, bringing politics into a matter that should be left to the the experts, and should approve the text without emotion."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph