Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-16-Speech-3-247-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20111116.18.3-247-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The European Heritage Label is intended to strengthen European citizens’ sense of belonging to the European Union by highlighting shared elements, and is particularly aimed at evoking such feelings in young people. The European Heritage Label will be awarded on the basis of criteria that are precisely defined by the Commission. An expert panel (12 members appointed by the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament) shall examine the sites pre-selected and proposed by the individual Member States (two each per year, of which a maximum of one will be awarded the label). The Member States undertake to preserve the sites according to criteria laid down by the Commission. If these criteria are met, which will examined by the panel, then the label will be remain awarded for an indefinite period; if not, the label will be withdrawn after two warnings and a 36-month deadline. Transnational sites will be given priority when judging the pre-selected sites, and sites that have already been awarded the label will be reassessed. I voted in favour of the report because the amendments clearly pay greater attention to the added value of the label as compared to other initiatives within the field of cultural heritage and should also ensure that it is genuinely only the most outstanding sites that are awarded such a label."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples