Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-11-16-Speech-3-026-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-11-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Economic governance2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111116.5.3-026-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-11-16-Speech-3-027-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Philip Claeys2
lpv:spokenAs	member; NA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Vlaams Belang (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, if one form of common policy does not work, then what we need is more common policy. That is the axiom, the dogma, professed by the Commission, the Council and also a majority of this House. I would like to give my fellow Members a reality check. Is there, for example, democratic support for the systematic rush ahead to a kind of super-Europe that will even involve itself in the tax and the social security systems of the Member States? Is there a point in keeping a Member State that does not structurally fit into the euro area within that area purely and simply out of a refusal, on ideological grounds, to admit that mistakes were made in the past? How much further can we go in taxing the EU’s net contributors? Ladies and gentlemen, it is high time that we brought EU policy into line with the reality of the real world, instead of continuing to try and do the opposite."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph