Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-10-27-Speech-4-248-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-10-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"et"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111027.17.4-248-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-10-27-Speech-4-248-2502
lpv:speaker	lp:Siiri Oviir2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Eesti Keskerakond (2009-07-14--2012-05-24)3 member; EMPL (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2009-07-20--2014-06-30)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-29--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"− I did not support the points that were emphasised in the resolution dealing with the events in Ukraine. The European Parliament does not have the authority to be an ‘attorney’ for Yulia Tymoshenko. That is precisely the tendency of the main argument of the resolution. The conviction of the former prime minister is an assessment of her activities, of an action that exceeded her authority and of her fraudulent positive portrayal of a controversial government decision that made it possible for Ukraine to conclude an economically unfavourable agreement with the Russian Federation. Thus it is not correct to refer to the judgment as a violation of human rights and to the trial as politically motivated. It is nevertheless true that every trial of a politician is to a certain extent political. We in this parliament have also participated in giving a political veneer to this trial."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph