Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-10-27-Speech-4-174-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-10-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111027.17.4-174-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-10-27-Speech-4-174-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Mikael Gustafsson2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2011-10-17--2014-06-30)3,3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2011-10-05--2012-01-12)3,3 chair; FEMM (2011-10-03--2012-01-18)3,3 member; Conference of Committee Chairs (2011-10-03--2012-01-18)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2011-10-24--2012-02-12)3,3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2011-10-24--2012-05-20)3,3 unknown; Vänsterpartiet (2011-09-22--2014-06-30)3,3 member; IMCO (2011-09-26--2012-01-18)3,3
lpv:translated text	"− I voted in favour of the report on the basis of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the fact that the welfare of the child must come first. Child pornography is a cross-border problem that harms children and therefore I support measures to combat it. The technique of blocking websites is certainly not very effective and the websites just reappear somewhere else. However, it is a usable tool. Removing or blocking material on the Internet is, however, a restriction of the freedom of expression and must be done in a legally certain manner. Internet users must be informed of the reason why a site is blocked and how they can appeal against it. It is also important that the EU rules that are introduced do not interfere with Sweden’s work to prevent child pornography. Member States that already have a good system in place for combating child pornography must be allowed to retain it."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph