Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-10-27-Speech-4-016-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-10-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Ombudsman's annual report 2010 (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111027.5.4-016-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-10-27-Speech-4-017-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Marek Henryk Migalski2
lpv:spokenAs	member; CULT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; REGI (2009-07-21--2012-01-18)3 member; PECH (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Polska Jest Najważniejsza (2011-02-21--2014-01-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Mr Diamandouros, Commissioner, Ms Iotova has told us that, indeed, most complaints addressed to the Ombudsman relate to activities of the European Commission. This is a classic example of one branch or body of the European Union finding solutions to problems created by another body within the EU. Unfortunately, it is a classic example of growing bureaucracy which, according to some sociological laws, is inevitable. Mr McMillan-Scott told us correctly that the Ombudsman has the appropriate staff. Unfortunately, there are already 64 of them. The budget of the Ombudsman institution is already nearly EUR 10 million. The question naturally suggests itself as to whether the important work carried out by the Ombudsman should really require such a budget and the involvement of so many people. These doubts explain why my group will abstain from voting on the Iotova report."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph