Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-10-25-Speech-2-282-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20111025.25.2-282-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-10-25-Speech-2-282-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Diogo Feio2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partido Popular (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Anyone who knows the courts in the Member States knows about the increasing difficulties they have been having in ensuring the timely resolution of disputes that come before them. The complexity of procedural law and the number of cases being heard has been overloading judges, magistrates, lawyers and legal officials who, despite their skill and dedication, are finding it impossible to deal with all the disputes within the proper timeframe. Many of these issues presently inundating the courts are of no particular legal complexity or financial significance, and could be settled using alternative dispute resolution methods that are more effective and less complex. There are various examples of these types of methods in operation throughout the Union. I believe we should not seek to impose models on the Member States as regards these mechanisms, but instead provide them with information about each country’s practices and experiences, so that they might improve their own mechanisms."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph