Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-14-Speech-3-467-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:State of play of the Middle East peace process (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110914.29.3-467-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-14-Speech-3-468-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Frédérique Ries2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with Israel (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Mouvement Réformateur (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ALDE (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I will be brief. I wanted to say something earlier on regarding the principle behind this blue-card procedure. I do not have the Rules of Procedure to hand, but I find it slightly regrettable that the blue card has become a sort of justification for confrontations that no longer have much to do with the speeches made here. This is very much the case in the heated debates we are having, particularly concerning the Middle East. It seems to me that the point of the blue card is to respond to points made in our speeches. It should not turn into a kind of interrogation, overall inquisition or general argument. This is a trivial point, but each time I take the floor in this House, Ms Kiil-Nielsen has something to say. As regards the use of the term ‘unilateral’, this simply means that we are talking about a negotiated solution. This seems straightforward to me. I did explain this. I had one minute and thirty seconds allocated for that and it is not up to me to justify all the settlements. I have already referred Ms Kiil-Nielsen … May I at least answer the questions that were put to me? I do not know how much time has been allotted to me, but I am not going to take less time to answer the question than it took to ask it."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(The President asked the speaker to conclude)"1 "(The President cut off the speaker)"1 "ad hominem"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph