Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-14-Speech-3-065-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Economic crisis and the euro (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110914.3.3-065-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-14-Speech-3-066-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ildikó Gáll-pelcz2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2010-11-16--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2010-06-30--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; EMPL (2010-09-28--2011-12-13)3,3 member; ECON (2010-10-06--2012-01-18)3,3 unknown; Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Keresztény Demokrata Néppárt (2010-06-02--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2010-07-05--2013-06-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	". I cannot accept that after the summer eurozone summits we are still talking about the theoretical explanations for the euro crisis. The citizens ask us every day, and with good reason, why and for how long we intend to leave the euro in an exposed position, and what the shortest way out of the crisis would be. Of course, certain Member States take practical action. However, their situation is not made easy if their work is downgraded at every turn in various ways. I am referring to the irresponsible and completely unjustified manifestations of credit rating agencies, and to a few unfortunate assertions made by the Commission. Not only were crisis management tools not available in good time, but I feel that even today the Commission has no solid, forward-looking recommendations, even though it is clear that Member States are becoming increasingly exposed without clear guidelines. So far I too have shared the opinion that this is a debt crisis rather than a euro crisis. Well, if much more time is wasted, we may even witness a euro crisis."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph