Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-07-05-Speech-2-485-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110705.34.2-485-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-07-05-Speech-2-486-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; REGI (2009-09-14--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Platforma Obywatelska (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"− The EU’s ambitions to reduce CO over the next few years are extremely significant. We must remember, however, that unless the US, China and India take a similar approach, our ambitions will not yield the anticipated result. The current objective is to reduce CO emissions by 20%, and even this represents a huge effort for some EU Member States, whose coal-based economies cannot be shifted to other sources of energy in a short space of time. Further moves to tighten up emissions restrictions would entail high costs for the EU as a whole, and would result in EU-based economic entities being less competitive than those in the US, China or India. For this reason, I do not believe that the Eickhout report responds to the expectations of a significant number of Europe’s citizens and economic entities, and I therefore voted in favour of rejecting it. Thank you."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph