Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-23-Speech-4-559-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110623.37.4-559-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-23-Speech-4-560-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Aldo Patriciello2
lpv:spokenAs	member; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Il Popolo della Libertà (2009-07-14--2013-12-05)3 member; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"− The proposal for a directive presented by the Commission sets out an EU legal framework for spent fuel and radioactive waste management. The proposal lays down requirements to ensure that Member States establish a national regulatory and organisational framework, in order to be able to draw up appropriate national programmes for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, from their generation to their disposal. The proposal is based on the Euratom Treaty and, in particular, on the guidelines provided in the report ‘Assessing Euratom – 50 years of European nuclear energy policy’. The rapporteur identifies four main priorities among the amendments tabled in the draft report for consideration by the members of the committee. The first is the need to envisage concepts and technical solutions for final disposal, in particular deep geological disposal. The second is the need to ensure that adequate financial resources are set aside to meet the requirements of nuclear plant decommissioning and that the resultant waste is disposed of. The third concerns the development of regional disposal facilities, while the fourth deals with transparency and participation of the public. For these reasons, I voted in favour of the proposal for a directive."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph