Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-23-Speech-4-117-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:5th cohesion report and strategy for the post-2013 cohesion policy - Implementation of cohesion policy programmes for 2007-2013 - European urban agenda and its future in cohesion policy - Objective 3: future agenda for cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation - Increased effectiveness between ERDF and other structural funds (continuation of debate)2
dcterms:Language	"bg"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110623.7.4-117-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-23-Speech-4-118-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Slavi Binev2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Attack (2009-07-14--2011-09-27)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2009-09-16--2012-12-10)3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2012-12-10)3 substitute; DROI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". Improving the business climate is also part of cohesion policy. However, an efficiently operating judicial system is required to do this. The lack of action from the legislative authority regarding the extremely urgent changes in the judicial system is noticeable. We have obligations to our European partners to undertake large-scale reforms in this area, which need to cope adequately with the numerous cases in Bulgaria’s courts, especially with those involving corruption at high levels and the indications of it. The numerous negative assessments, as a whole, from the European Commission and the European courts regarding the reforms to the judicial system and the spreading corruption have not changed the government’s criminally negligent attitude towards any kind of reforms in this area. Why do people who have the right to initiate changes to the law not do it, yet, at the same time, justify their mistakes with the lack of reforms? Why are double standards being protected? In whose interest is it to delay reforms? It is shocking that in the 21st century citizens in Bulgaria do not have the opportunity to bring an individual complaint before the Constitutional Court, a right which is taken for granted by citizens in Germany, for instance. Why are senior judges elected in an extremely dubious, obscure way and why do very grave doubts remain about interference from the executive?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph