Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-23-Speech-4-024-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:2012 draft budget trilogue (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110623.4.4-024-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-23-Speech-4-025-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Helga Trüpel2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Israel (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 vice-chair; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-07-08--2011-06-30)3,3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 vice-chair; CULT (2009-07-20--2012-01-18)3,3 member; BUDG (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, Mr Lewandowski, ladies and gentlemen, firstly I would like to give my general support to what Mr Lewandowski has said about the fact that in times of crisis the important thing is to ensure the right balance between the need to make savings, the effective use of funding, austerity measures and, at the same time, the readiness and the ability to invest, so that we do not completely stall our economy. I am in favour of these general guidelines and I believe that they should also be the benchmark for our budget. Now the question is whether the requirement that Mr Lewandowski has so rightly referred to can actually be met. There are a number of important areas of criticism from the perspective of the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance. If we highlight one particular project, the ITER nuclear fusion reactor, it becomes clear that this is one of the projects which is receiving the largest increase in funding in the next budget, in other words, EUR 740 million. Is this the right signal to be sending out at a time when funding for other research projects, in particular for renewable energy, is being cut? We want to take seriously the claims made by the Commission and the European Union that they really intend to combat climate change and to move towards the use of renewable energy, but then we see that the funding for this project is given such a high priority and we believe that this is the wrong decision. For this reason, we were not able to give our support to this negotiating mandate, despite the fact that we believe that much of it is correct."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph