Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-08-Speech-3-559-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Revised Hungarian constitution (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110608.24.3-559-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-08-Speech-3-560-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ildikó Gáll-pelcz2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2010-11-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2010-06-30--2014-06-30)3 substitute; EMPL (2010-09-28--2011-12-13)3 member; Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (2010-10-06--2011-07-31)3 member; ECON (2010-10-06--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Keresztény Demokrata Néppárt (2010-06-02--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2010-07-05--2013-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr Alvaro, this is true, just one sentence. We agree. This criticism is shameful. My question is this: on what grounds do you base your opinion that a fundamental law adopted by a two-thirds majority cannot be changed in a democratic country? It could be changed so far. It can be changed in other countries as well. Please be specific. Which exactly are the common values, common European values, that the Hungarian constitution excludes, rejects, or comes into conflict with? Because what you are saying is too general."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph