Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-08-Speech-3-476-250"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110608.20.3-476-250"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-08-Speech-3-476-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Franz Obermayr2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; EMPL (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2009-09-16--2012-02-12)3 member; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Once again (as in the case of the ITER project), the EU has managed to delay a project for so long that the costs are impossible to estimate. This is equally true for the follow-up costs for the GNSS (Galileo and EGNOS satellite navigation systems) and Schengen Information System II projects. It is not just follow-up costs that have exploded: ‘normal’ project costs have also reached massive proportions. An attempt is now being made to limit damage by making savings. These are necessary moves. Unfortunately, it seems as if these cuts will only affect the European taxpayer as they will result in reductions in services. Although GNSS will only have a military application, it will be the taxpayers who foot the bill – twice over now as a result of the follow-up costs. This situation casts a pall over the GNSS project, which is otherwise something to be welcomed. For that reason, I have abstained from voting."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph