Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-06-08-Speech-3-399-500"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-06-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110608.20.3-399-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-06-08-Speech-3-400-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Regina Bastos2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (2009-10-08--2011-07-31)3 unknown; Partido Social Democrata (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; EMPL (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; IMCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Impact assessments (IAs) are an instrument central to the legislative process. Rigour requires the gathering of concrete facts for political decision making, and a guarantee that all the relevant strategic options will be examined when any specific problem is being solved. Impact studies should be applied to all legislative proposals, they should have a clear methodology, and they should be undertaken with full independence and transparency. IAs should also assess the option of inaction, as well as the specific consequences for small and medium-sized enterprises. Despite the improvements in this area, IAs by the European Commission and European Parliament could improve even further. This report, which I voted for, calls for closer involvement of Parliament’s committees and a detailed explanation when the Commission refrains from issuing an IA. Finally, it challenges Parliament’s committees to increase the use of IAs so as to improve the quality of its law making."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph