Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-05-11-Speech-3-417-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-05-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110511.28.3-417-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-05-11-Speech-3-417-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Rareș-Lucian Niculescu2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Israel (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partidul Democrat-Liberal (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; PECH (2010-06-02--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; AGRI (2009-07-20--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"I voted against a part of paragraph 36 because the provision it contains is, to say the least, unrealistic. I do not think that we should ban construction on forest land which has been affected by fire because it is actually impossible for this land to be used for other purposes. I do not think that we should present cases of abuse as the general rule and harm the property rights of the forests’ owners who have already been affected by a forest fire. However, I find acceptable the idea expressed in paragraph 37, which proposes imposing a ban where a fire is proven to have been started deliberately. However, in this situation, I think that we may be faced with the adverse consequences which would result from this: the arsonist is not necessarily the property owner and I do not understand why the latter ought to be punished."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph