Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-05-10-Speech-2-529-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-05-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Migration flows and asylum and their impact on Schengen (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110510.63.2-529-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-05-10-Speech-2-530-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jens Rohde2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; LIBE (2010-11-22--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2009-07-20--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, Mr Schulz has left us, but I am pleased that he and Mrs Rodust have made it clear that it was not Social Democrat policy that border controls should be reintroduced. However, two years ago, during the election campaign for the European Parliament, the key demand of the Danish Social Democrats was that the borders should be closed again. I am not talking about the right-wing populists. Mr Jørgensen and party leader Mrs Thorning-Schmidt both argued for this. You are absolutely right, this is populism. An important question for the Commission is therefore as follows: Can a country reintroduce border controls and still remain in the Schengen Union with access to the information system, etc., or is this an either-or situation? The question is important for the Danish debate, which is why I ask that a clear answer be given."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph