Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-05-10-Speech-2-392-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-05-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110510.60.2-392-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-05-10-Speech-2-393-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Karin Kadenbach2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AGRI (2011-02-22--2012-01-18)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2013-04-14)3
lpv:translated text	". As regards paragraph 129 of the report on the ‘2009 discharge: EU general budget – European Parliament’, which concerns the ‘voluntary pension fund’, I wish to state that I am categorically voting against this because it involves using taxpayers’ money to finance pension funds for Members of the European Parliament (paragraph 129(i)). There is no reason not to raise the retirement age for the Scheme from 60 to 63 (paragraph 129(ii)). It is a good thing for the managers of the Fund to be called upon to adopt a more prudent and balanced investment strategy (paragraph 129(iii)). As a matter of principle I am in favour of phasing out the present pension scheme."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph