Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-05-10-Speech-2-056-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-05-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:2009 discharge (continuation of debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110510.6.2-056-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-05-10-Speech-2-057-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jan Olbrycht2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-09-16--2012-02-02)3 vice-chair; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-07-08--2011-06-30)3 unknown; Platforma Obywatelska (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2013-01-27)3 member; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2010-09-06--2014-06-30)3 substitute; BUDG (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; REGI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; CONT (2009-07-16--2011-12-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, every debate on the discharge takes place in a certain context. On the one hand, today’s debate is taking place in the context of the crisis, the preventive measures being taken and the financial difficulties being experienced by certain Member States, while on the other hand it is being held against the backdrop of the new financial perspective for the post-2014 period, which has already been drafted. We must be aware of the fact that our comments today regarding the implementation of the budget have a very serious impact on the debate on the future of the financial perspective. Therefore the debate on the discharge is important not only in terms of monitoring, but also in terms of correcting errors and taking note of areas where we have failed or where up-to-date measures mean we are now faced with new requirements. A characteristic feature of this debate is not only the fact that ever more people are criticising the budget, but also that the results are quite obviously better, for example in respect of cohesion policy, where clear improvements have been made, albeit improvements which have gone unnoticed by the critics of the European budget. I would also like to draw attention to the fact that these positive results must now also be integrated into our considerations regarding future action, or in other words the type of action that must be continued and the regulations that must be introduced, in particular with regard to the recovery of funds. I would also like to draw the House’s attention to the following issue: the debate on whether the budget has been implemented properly must be accompanied by a debate on the effectiveness of policies. We refer to this very frequently in parliamentary documents, but we concentrate on procedures. There has been much talk of a Europe of results, but this is not the same as following the correct procedures. One entails the other, but we must also pay attention to the effects and results of our actions."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph