Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-12-13-Speech-1-213"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-12-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Territorial, social and economic cohesion - Good governance and EU regional policy (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"bg"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101213.20.1-213"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-12-13-Speech-1-9942
lpv:speaker	lp:Slavi Binev2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Attack (2009-07-14--2011-09-27)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2009-09-16--2012-12-10)3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2012-12-10)3 substitute; DROI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"In order to achieve true social and economic cohesion among the Member States, first we need to address their differences, not just in terms of economic growth and development, but in terms of their physical location. At this stage, I see no point in talking of common measures. The measures for each Member State must differ, because their needs differ. As regards the role of the Commission in the procedures for providing assistance and monitoring good governance in regional policy, it is my view that it must first clearly outline and state its engagements. From my own experience in raising issues with the Commission, I either get an answer that is evasive, or am simply told that the question is not within its competence. I am from a country where, for many years, passing the buck has been standard procedure, and what I wish is for the competences of the Commission to be clearly delineated, so that we can get clear answers and precise actions in particular circumstances."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph